[HTML][HTML] Comprehensive evaluation of AmpliSeq transcriptome, a novel targeted whole transcriptome RNA sequencing methodology for global gene expression …

W Li, A Turner, P Aggarwal, A Matter, E Storvick… - BMC genomics, 2015 - Springer
W Li, A Turner, P Aggarwal, A Matter, E Storvick, DK Arnett, U Broeckel
BMC genomics, 2015Springer
Background Whole transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) represents a powerful approach
for whole transcriptome gene expression analysis. However, RNA-seq carries a few
limitations, eg, the requirement of a significant amount of input RNA and complications led
by non-specific mapping of short reads. The Ion AmpliSeq™ Transcriptome Human Gene
Expression Kit (AmpliSeq) was recently introduced by Life Technologies as a whole-
transcriptome, targeted gene quantification kit to overcome these limitations of RNA-seq. To …
Background
Whole transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) represents a powerful approach for whole transcriptome gene expression analysis. However, RNA-seq carries a few limitations, e.g., the requirement of a significant amount of input RNA and complications led by non-specific mapping of short reads. The Ion AmpliSeq™ Transcriptome Human Gene Expression Kit (AmpliSeq) was recently introduced by Life Technologies as a whole-transcriptome, targeted gene quantification kit to overcome these limitations of RNA-seq. To assess the performance of this new methodology, we performed a comprehensive comparison of AmpliSeq with RNA-seq using two well-established next-generation sequencing platforms (Illumina HiSeq and Ion Torrent Proton). We analyzed standard reference RNA samples and RNA samples obtained from human induced pluripotent stem cell derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs).
Results
Using published data from two standard RNA reference samples, we observed a strong concordance of log2 fold change for all genes when comparing AmpliSeq to Illumina HiSeq (Pearson’s r = 0.92) and Ion Torrent Proton (Pearson’s r = 0.92). We used ROC, Matthew’s correlation coefficient and RMSD to determine the overall performance characteristics. All three statistical methods demonstrate AmpliSeq as a highly accurate method for differential gene expression analysis. Additionally, for genes with high abundance, AmpliSeq outperforms the two RNA-seq methods. When analyzing four closely related hiPSC-CM lines, we show that both AmpliSeq and RNA-seq capture similar global gene expression patterns consistent with known sources of variations.
Conclusions
Our study indicates that AmpliSeq excels in the limiting areas of RNA-seq for gene expression quantification analysis. Thus, AmpliSeq stands as a very sensitive and cost-effective approach for very large scale gene expression analysis and mRNA marker screening with high accuracy.
Springer