Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the oral interleukin-12/23 inhibitor apilimod mesylate for treatment of active Crohn's disease

BE Sands, EW Jacobson… - Inflammatory bowel …, 2010 - academic.oup.com
BE Sands, EW Jacobson, T Sylwestrowicz, Z Younes, G Dryden, R Fedorak, S Greenbloom
Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2010academic.oup.com
Abstract Background Interleukin-12 (IL-12) and interleukin-23 (IL-23) are inflammatory
cytokines linked to the Th-1 and Th-17 phenotypes associated with Crohn's disease (CD).
We investigated the activity and safety of apilimod mesylate (formerly STA-5326), an oral IL-
12 and IL-23 inhibitor, in patients with active CD. Methods We performed a multicenter,
Phase 2, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of
apilimod mesylate in treating 220 adult patients with moderate-to-severe CD (Crohn's …
Background
Interleukin-12 (IL-12) and interleukin-23 (IL-23) are inflammatory cytokines linked to the Th-1 and Th-17 phenotypes associated with Crohn's disease (CD). We investigated the activity and safety of apilimod mesylate (formerly STA-5326), an oral IL-12 and IL-23 inhibitor, in patients with active CD.
Methods
We performed a multicenter, Phase 2, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of apilimod mesylate in treating 220 adult patients with moderate-to-severe CD (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] score 220–450). Patients were stratified according to C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and corticosteroid use and were randomly assigned to receive placebo or apilimod mesylate 50 mg daily or 100 mg daily. The study was divided into an induction phase (43 days) and a maintenance phase (125 days). The primary analysis involved a comparison of the proportion of patients experiencing clinical response, defined as at least a 100-point decrease in CDAI score from baseline at day 29. Data on adverse events were also collected.
Results
In all, 220 of the planned 282 patients were enrolled when the Data Monitoring Committee determined that the drug was not efficacious as a treatment and closed enrollment. A clinical response was experienced by 18 patients (24.7%) in the 50-mg daily (QD) group (n = 73) and 19 patients (25.7%) in the 100 mg QD group (n = 74), as compared with 21 patients (28.8%) in the placebo group (n = 73) on day 29 (P = 0.71 for each comparison). No significant adverse safety signal was observed.
Conclusions
Apilimod was well-tolerated but did not demonstrate efficacy over placebo in patients with active CD. (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2009)
Oxford University Press